In recent weeks, you may have seen a television ad that indicates Michigan is in a very precarious position in the area of future power supply. For some utilities in our state that may be true and those ads cast a very ominous cloud over Michigan and what could happen.

However, I want to share with you how Cherryland Electric Cooperative (CEC), and its power supplier, Wolverine Power Cooperative (Wolverine), ARE investing for the future power supply needs of our members. Furthermore, I want to provide you some details on who is behind those rather gloomy television advertisements and what they hope to achieve.

First, I want to point out that CEC and Wolverine are currently investing approximately $140 million in the development and construction of the Alpine Power Plant near Gaylord. This 430-megawatt natural gas fired power plant, which will become operational next year, will meet the future electric capacity needs of CEC and four of our fellow electric cooperatives well into the future. We are proactively working hard to meet your future electric needs.

Now, let’s talk about those ads that you frequently see during the 6 o’clock news on your local stations. Those ads are the work of one of our state’s largest public relations firms in conjunction with Detroit Edison and Consumers Energy—Michigan’s two largest electric utilities.

Their multi-million advertising campaign has one very simple goal—to eliminate electric competition in Michigan. It is our understanding that they are spending $2-3 million on those ads in an effort to enact changes in state law by raising the doubts and fear of electric consumers and our elected officials in Lansing.

Michigan law, enacted in 2008, allows 10% of an electric utility’s customers to choose another supplier. Michigan’s electric cooperatives believe that the threat of 10% of our sales base leaving us for another supplier has made us more attentive to member needs and competitive pressures.

In fact, I am proud to point out that CEC has NEVER lost a member to another supplier—even though our two largest members have had that option since 2000. We believe that competitive rates and high quality service are the reason our large members have chosen to stay with CEC.

The big utilities in our state, in conjunction with their Lansing public relations firm, are attempting to use those scare tactics to change state law and eliminate competitive options for their large customers. They say they need greater assurance that their customers won’t leave for other suppliers before they can build additional generating plants. They said the same thing in 2008 when state legislators reduced their risk by capping the market at 10%.

In the end, we have an obligation to serve your needs affordably and we take that obligation seriously.

Tony Anderson